Key point summary
It’s pretty unique what is happening in the UK regarding governmental intervention in the education system (structural reforms, curriculum reforms, assessment reforms, accountability reforms, teacher preparation reforms, governance reforms, teacher remuneration reforms, funding formula reforms….). However, amidst all this turbulence, it is worth remembering that there are international exemplars in some of these areas from which we can learn.
For example, we have become preoccupied by an emergent model of Multi-Academy Trust in which large providers accumulate and incorporate schools into a prescribed model of schooling – often with an accompanying change in leadership. Ark, or Harris Academies would be two of the best-known examples. These are high reliability MATs, to be respected for their achievements, not least because many of the schools they incorporate have had troubled histories – and they raise student achievement levels. However, there are others, such as Aldridge Foundation, Aspirations Academy Trust or Enquire Learning Trust – that are pioneering different types of school and different ways of collaborating.
However, whatever your MAT approach of choice, there are international examples that are even more successful, and which use their collaborative potential to apply enlightened values and design principles, towards a different vision for education.
The focus of this piece is High Tech High, our MAT of choice, described below.
Starting with a transformative design principles
Before doing that, it is probably worth dwelling on a key way in which all the highly successful, collectively governed ‘new school model’ groups in the States differ profoundly from the prevalent UK MAT models. (Accepting that they are not technically MATs at all!) It is that they all began with an ambitious and successful new school design – a serious attempt to realise in practice an aspirational set of design principles; to create a model of school different from the past and suitable for the current century; to major on learner engagement, passion and agency; to aspire to beautiful work, learning of service to the world; to have as a non-negotiable focus success for all students.
Then they grew the ‘MAT’ and created a community of practice around their model – a professional learning community of schools, adults and young people united by values, aspirations and purposes based on their design principles
This is quintessentially how High Tech High grew.
High Tech High viewed as a MAT
So, High Tech High in San Diego is our MAT of choice – even though ‘MAT’ is not at all how it perceives itself. It is currently a coalition of 13 small charter schools (think academies or free schools) in San Diego administered under one governance arrangement, led by a Chief Executive, one of the co-founders, Larry Rosenstock. Collectively, it offers a K-12 (all-through) locality provision, completely comprehensive of San Diego. This is how it describes itself:
High Tech High operates thirteen schools in San Diego County: four elementary schools, four middle schools, and five high schools. All of these schools serve a diverse, lottery-selected student population; all embody the High Tech High design principles:
- Adult world connection
- Common intellectual mission
- Teacher as designer.
It is the best MAT not because of its measurable outcomes (which are astonishing), but for the depth and originality and consistency of its practices. However, to make the point, three measurable features would be: its collective ambition (non-negotiable success for all students, defined as 100% College and University entrance entitlement); its levels of achievement in this ambition, 99%, plus 85% of all free school meals students completing university degrees; its levels of student engagement and teacher learning.
There are a number of central architectural features (things that hold all 13 schools together) that are each significant in their own right, but which are even more powerful in combination. They are grouped below in a relatively arbitrary but hopefully helpful way.
Shared beliefs and expectations
HTH schools are all bound together by the four design principles – which act as a common cultural and organisational architecture and as a shared form of mutual accountability. There is much that could be written about each of these, but this is not the place.
Staff across the 13 schools buy in to what they call a ‘shared intellectual mission’. Think of this as a MAT-wide sustained action enquiry: a collective commitment to learning their way forward towards success with their school design and with the achievement of equitable outcomes for all students. This shared intellectual mission is a collaborative, challenging and sustained endeavour, and it leads to the accumulation and refinement of a body of practice.
They have a framework of non-negotiable values. For example, no ’tracking’ (grouping by presumptions of ability) is one example. Others would be: ‘teaching is a team sport’; build from teacher and student passions; leadership comes from the classroom; expect everyone to be exceptional, and have processes that enable everyone to be exceptional.
They take collective responsibility for the success of all students – and are collectively accountable for the totality of the MAT’s achievements. They pool outcomes across the schools, for example – 13 schools, but one High Tech High data set.
A community of teachers working together as a community of practice
One of the features oh High Tech High schools is that they share common adult learning time. School begins at 9.00 am for students but 8.00 am for staff. That hour before school is dedicated to collaborative planning, the study of lessons, critique of work and professional learning of a variety of forms.
Teachers teach colloboratively (50+ students shared between two teachers) because ‘teaching is a team sport’, and this happens in collaborative settings (spaces that facilitate fluidity of movement). They plan in their pairs and all projects are additionally reviewed and critiqued collaboratively by a wider group of staff. This is very powerful and serves multiple functions. For example, it quality assures all project designs; it adds value by drawing on the ideas of a wider group of staff; it makes the designs explicit and shared more widely.
All staff have their own digital portfolio, and are expected to make their project designs and resources visible and open source, so ideas and practices travel – both within the HTH community of schools and also more widely with the profession at large. Professional knowledge and artefacts at HTH are also public materials.
The teachers develop and apply common learning protocols to their work, both in their own learning and in their teaching. These learning protocols are founded on the assumption that quality learning does not happen by accident, but that it has to be scaffolded by defined processes and behaviours. They support collaborative work, create shared learning expectations, ensure parity of contribution and act as a form of mutual accountability. Across the MAT, teachers would all be familiar with the use of these protocols.
HTH within the wider local ecosystem
The language associated with learning at HTH would include aspirations to be ‘authentic’, to source ‘real-world’ applications and to give students ‘agency’ in the world. It is unsurprising, therefore that it is deeply integrated into (and permeable to) its local community in multiple ways. Larry Rosenstock has long railed against school as ‘the citadel on the hill’. This permeability works two ways:
- Incoming – they use external expertise to critique and refine their practice; they are wide open to researchers and documentary film-makers; parents are active partners and attend all exhibitions and student learning conferences; the projects students do usually involve community experts, both in the process and the assessment of the exhibitions
- Outgoing – from an early age, the projects that students undertake are designed to make contributions to the wider San Diego community – campaigns to increase blood donorship; exhibitions in public spaces; published environmental studies of the local coastline; campaigns to improve local amenities; studies of immigration patterns – always with a civic audience and purpose. Students also undertake extensive internships (which is community located learning, not work experience).
As indicated above, the MAT is highly permeable to learning from outside. They have more than 2,000 visitors a year coming in to critique their work – visitors are expected to do so. They make the network of HTH schools a site of study in multiple ways. They deploy their staff to work in places from which they will learn, both within the States and internationally. (Innovation Unit has had six HTH staff secondees working on programmes in UK schools, including two new schools: School 21 and XP School.)
Features that can only be achieved as a MAT
The 13 schools create a large canvas for teacher learning – one large professional learning community; one community of practice. HTH also moves or deploys teachers between schools – utilising capability and expertise in the collective interests of all students, rather than the narrow interests of the individual school.
They have publication streams, celebrating and sharing across the MAT, but also for use within their programmes (they run MOOCs, for example) and in service of their commitment to making professional knowledge public. ‘Unboxed’ is a professional journal that ‘reifies’ the practices of teachers from across the schools.
Leadership is deployed similarly. You cannot be the principal of a HTH school unless you have been a teacher there. They grow their own leadership capability and manage their own leadership succession.
High Tech High has established a Graduate School of Education – the only school-based graduate school in the States, and something that would simply not be feasible without the scale of the operation. It can deliver both beginning teacher credentials (managing their own supply of philosophically committed recruits) and their own Masters degrees, for which teachers engage in action research on behalf of the MAT community. The Grad school also acts as a knowledge management hub because:
- It enables their practices to be codified within teacher learning and leadership development programmes for adult learning purposes
- It allows them to train and induct and quality assure most of their own beginning teachers
- By encouraging all their staff to undertake action research Masters there, they ensure reconnection with the knowledge base; they constantly interrogate their practices through research activity; and they are constantly adding to the MATs leadership quotient
- Action research as part of these Masters programmes feeds back into the collective knowledge-base
- The graduate school accept none-HTH participants from San Diego, requiring them to induct new people (a key feature of COP theory) and to be externally challenged by them (a key feature of HTH’s commitment to peer critique).
Three thoughts. The first is that not very much here has been made of some of the distinctive features of pedagogical practice and student learning at HTH – interdisciplinary learning; project-based designs; public exhibition of work; peer critique and multiple drafting; digital portfolios; internships; student-led conferences. These will be some of the more innovative characteristics of a HTH school, but this article is about the MAT-ness of their work together. Another set of MAT schools, implementing most of the MAT features above, could focus on a different set of pedagogical practices.
The second is this. Hopefully, this article might be of interest to those whose mental model of MAT has been constrained by the dominant prevailing orthodoxies, yet who have more progressive aspirations. If that sounds a bit patronising, what is meant is that the current debate has locked us into a perception of MATs as a structural innovation. This short piece is making the point that progressive school-to-school collaboration is a process thing; a design-led thing; an ambition thing; a learning thing. Above and beyond anything else, a MAT can be a potential context for collaborative learning around high ambitions.
The third is potentially even more exciting. Few can (except in rare cases) build up a MAT from a single new school model as HTH did. School 21 can. XP School can. Most of us, though, have to start with our already established schools. However, this government has committed to 500 new Free Schools during this parliament. What ambitious MATs can do is to create together a new Free School, informed by their shared design principles and aspirations for future schooling and learning. It can be a laboratory for MAT learning; a prototype for all the schools; a subject of collective study and activity – what is called in learning theory a concrete operational illustration of what is possible, such that it begins to inform and inspire developments across the entire MAT.